Animal
testing is a major phenomenon in today’s world. This week’s lecture and
materials touch upon Biotechnology art and show it to be one of the most
controversial art forms today. Professor Vesna introduces a few artists in her
lectures who talk about and who have researched animal testing.
Eduardo Kac is first introduced along
with his rabbit Alba. This scientist would conduct experiments oh his pet rabbit
Alba. Some of these experiments included the injecting of genes that possessed fluorescent
jelly fish in them. This injection was called the zygote micro injection. The
picture below shows the rabbit after the zygote micro injection. This may
satisfy a person’s fantasies to own a fluorescent rabbit, but this seems like a
ridiculous way to produce art. For decades now, there has been many protest to
end animal testing and experiments. Even though many different experiments and
test done to animals have significantly benefitted humans, I think this
injection specifically should not be continued.
There are very few original ideas in today’s
world, and many ideas and concepts are continued, stretched, stolen, or even
spark another person’s creativity. In this case, Eduardo Kac’s experiment
influenced the organization, Symbiotic. Symbiotic works with biotechnical
artists and supports their practices. There are very similar, if not identical,
experiments to Eduardo Kac’s. In addition to the rabbit, insects are used for
research as well. There are some experiments done to better the flight pattern
of butterflies. In this case, I think that these experiments are beneficial
because butterflies are on the close watch list, and insects in general live
significantly shorter than rabbits and other mammals. These small tests will
benefit all butterflies in the long run.
George Gessert is another artist,
mentioned in professor Vesna’s lecture, who aspires to use biotechnology to positively
impact the environment. Gessert would breed plants and turn it into art. This was
not an original idea. Like I said earlier, many ideas inspire other great
scientists and/or artists. In this case, Gessert’s work branched off Edwards
Steichen’s research. Steichen would photograph the plants he bred as well. Both
artists are not harming the environment. Professor Vesna just points out these
artists to demonstrate how Biotechnology can be used to create beautiful art in
addition to helpful studies.
Kac, Eduardo. “Natural History of the Enigma.” Ekac. 2009. Web. 10 May 2017.
Victoria. “Biotechnology and Art Part 1” 1280x720." YouTube.
UC Online Program, 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 08 May 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaThVnA1kyg
Vesna,
Victoria. "Biotechnology and Art Part 2." Uc Online Program, 17 Mar.
2012. Web. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaThVnA1kyg
Vesna,
Victoria. "Biotechnology and Art Part 3." YouTube. UC
Online Program, 17 May 2012. Web. 08 May 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=3EpD3np1S2g
Vesna,
Victoria. "Biotechnology and Art Part 4." YouTube. UC
Online Program, 17 May 2012. Web. 08 May 2016.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=2qSc72u9KhI
Vesna,
Victoria. "Biotechnology and Art Part 5." YouTube. UC
Online Program, 17 May 2012. Web. 08 May 2016.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=z7zHIdsFS3A>.

I also found the work of George Gessert quite interesting. His breeding of plants speaks to the benefit of such work both artistically and scientifically. We as humans have been able to make biogenetic modifications to species of plants in order to aesthetically please and feed us further. I think biotechnology and art can serve beneficial purposes such as these.
ReplyDelete